dreyv vs Squads, Jupiter and Birdeye
Say what you want, see the result, then send it to your multisig. One place, and your keys stay yours.
Side by side
Most teams juggle a multisig, a swap site, a dashboard and a group chat. dreyv puts that work in one place.
| Capability | dreyv | Squads | Jupiter | Birdeye |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-custodial | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Multisig-native (Squads) | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Plain-language intent to plan (AI) | Yes | No | No | No |
| Forked-state simulation before signing | Yes | No | No | No |
| Human-readable impact for approvers | Yes | Partial | No | No |
| Swap routing (Jupiter) | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Onchain analytics and token research | Yes | No | Partial | Yes |
| MEV and rug-pull scanners | Yes | No | No | Partial |
| Yield routing (Marinade, Jito, Blaze) | Yes | No | No | No |
| Persistent knowledge memory (GraphRAG) | Yes | No | No | No |
| Build mini-apps and agents (Studio) | Yes | No | No | No |
| OpenAPI, MCP, ACP and x402 surface | Yes | No | Partial | No |
Where dreyv helps most
- Plain-language intent: describe a treasury plan in one sentence.
- Forked simulation with human-readable impact before any signature.
- A multisig-native (Squads) workflow with the simulation attached.
- An agent-ready surface: OpenAPI, MCP, ACP, UCP and x402.
Where the others still shine
- Squads: deep, audited multisig primitives. dreyv builds on top of them.
- Jupiter: excellent swap routing. dreyv uses Jupiter quotes inside plans.
- Birdeye: rich market data. dreyv complements it with intent and execution.
Try it on your next treasury move.
Connect a wallet, simulate a plan and send it to your multisig. Free to start.